Why backing female founders is more than just a numbers game
When I recently shared thoughts on LinkedIn about gender equity in Australian VC, the flood of DMs revealed a stark truth: weโre grappling with a more complex issue than simple statistics can convey.
Itโs time to look beyond the numbers and confront the nuanced realities of gender imbalance in our industry.
At first glance, the statistics are disheartening.
Research from Chief Executive Women shows that nearly half of ASX300 companies have no women in “CEO-track” roles.
In venture capital, the outlook is similarly bleak; about 85 cents in the dollar are deployed behind all male teams. But itโs not just about who gets fundedโit’s about how much.
In Australia, recent data reveals a stark disparity in first check sizes for VC-backed companies based on team composition: all-female teams receive an average of $700,000, mixed-gender teams $1.5 million, and all-male teams a staggering $3 million.
This gap isnโt just inequitableโit sets female founders up for a steeper climb from day one. Weโre basically telling them: get to the same milestone, in the same time frame, but with 25% of the fuel we give to your male counterparts.
At Flying Fox Ventures, weโre experimenting with ways to address this imbalance.
One initiative we are introducing is a female founder sidecar – a top up vehicle, where a startup with a female founder that meets our usual, rigorous selection criteria, will automatically receive a bigger cheque.
This isnโt a silver bullet, but itโs one of many needed experiments.
Our goal is simple:ย ensure exceptional female founders have the resources to achieve milestones on par with their male counterparts.
But money alone wonโt solve the problem. We need to address the entire ecosystem, from how pitches are received to how decisions are made.
Paula Burton, founder of Mass Dynamics, recently highlighted an unintended consequence of well-meaning diversity efforts during an Innovation Bay panel.
In many cases, female founders were being matched with junior women investors in the firmโan effort to increase representation.
However, as Paula pointed out, without senior women on the team, this often relegated women founders to meetings with junior investors who, while talented, lacked the influence to fully advocate for their picks.
So, what can we do? One simple experiment: ensure a senior investorโregardless of genderโis present in meetings with female founders.
Yes, we need more women in senior roles, but until then, having senior decision-makers in these rooms could help level the playing field.
Itโs also important to recognise the ongoing efforts to gather comprehensive data on startup funding for women and minorities. Initiatives like Equity Clear are doing vital work in helping us understand the broader landscape.
However, this kind of reporting can place a heavy burden on small investment teams. While data is essential for systemic change, we shouldnโt wait for perfect information before taking meaningful action.
Thatโs where small, actionable experiments come in.ย
At Flying Fox, our about-to-launch female founder sidecar is one such experiment.
Weโre not claiming itโs the only solution, but weโre hoping itโs a step in the right direction. By increasing cheque sizes for female-led startups, we aim to give these founders the same runway as their male counterparts. This isnโt about lowering the barโitโs about giving everyone an equal shot at clearing it.
As we move forward, we want to commit to both the big picture and the small, actionable steps along the way. We need the data and systemic analysis, but we also need to be willing to experiment and evolve our approaches to diversity and inclusion.
At the end of the day, progress is a team sport.
If we want more innovation, we need all players in the game. By backing female founders equally, weโre giving everyone a shot on goalโand thatโs where the magic happens.
* Kylie Frazer is the cofounder of Flying Fox Ventures, an early-stage venture capital firm with 62 companies in its portfolio.
Comments